KLA Digital Logo
KLA Digital
Alternatives

Humanloop alternatives

A practical migration guide for teams looking for Humanloop alternatives: observability, eval workflows, prompt management, and regulated governance paths.

For teams migrating prompt/eval workflows and deciding what to standardize for regulated production.

Last updated: Dec 17, 2025 · Version v1.0 · Not legal advice.

Context

How to use this page

  • If you used Humanloop for prompt iteration, eval loops, or run tracking, you can usually migrate without rewriting your whole stack.
  • The key decision is whether you need developer observability only, or workflow governance + audit-grade evidence exports.
Checklist

Migration checklist

The minimum steps to avoid losing institutional knowledge.

  • Export prompts, versions, datasets, and evaluation results.
  • Define how you will track runs in production (OpenTelemetry, traces, or gateway logs).
  • Decide where approvals/overrides live (and how they are captured as evidence).
  • Define sampling policy and reviewer rubric for post-market monitoring.
  • Run an “evidence export drill” before an audit (manifest + checksums + redaction).
Options

Recommended options by use case

Pick the layer you actually need.

Observability & evals

Langfuse, LangSmith, Phoenix, Weave, Braintrust, PromptLayer: strong choices for tracing/evals/prompt iteration.

Gateway layer

Portkey, LiteLLM, Helicone: useful if you need provider abstraction and request guardrails.

Regulated workflow governance

KLA is built for policy-as-code checkpoints, review queues, sampling controls, and verifiable evidence exports.

Links

Related links

Sample Evidence Room export

/downloads/evidence-room-sample.pdf

Open

Evidence pack checklist

/resources/evidence-pack-checklist

Open

Request a demo

/book-demo

Open
References

Sources